About gall stones

3 responses so far ↓

• 1 babette400 // Jul 31, 2005 at 12:35 pm

  So,,,,,,,what’s your point?
  Dale

• 2 Rodolfo Lorenza // Jul 31, 2005 at 3:42 pm

  At or about 16:24, 28/06/2002 (my clock), Dale Williams wrote the
  following:
  =========Start of Material Being Replied to========
  Just an interesting way of looking at things.

• 3 Larry Gabriele // Jul 31, 2005 at 9:33 pm

  My reason for asking had to do with the fact that this particular flagging is
  really quite vague in its application to all science. There are varied levels of
  intellectual thought that goes into virtually all things that happen in the
  world. Therefore, to slide it all in to a nice compact ten note slot would be
  nice but just isn’t really practical in the real world.
  Caveat emptor was the basis for living your life many years ago and it really
  does still apply today. In fact, that is really pretty much what this group is
  all about too. We often ask others for information regarding how things have
  happened for them whether it had to do with health or a remodeling of their
  house. Many will seek information from organizations that study various products
  and thereby make determinations as to which one they well ultimately purchase.
  We ask friends if they know of a reputable contractor for work of which may be
  needed on their homes or cars. It then becomes the base from which they live and
  it is caveat emptor. It is either by anecdotal consideration or it is from
  presumed fact or scientific fact. But one thing always remains the same and that
  
  is; variables do.
  One vary important variable is the human body and its response to even the
  minutest levels of various chemical inputs. Not all people will suffer and not
  all will benefit from some types of chemicals but then there are others of which
  will certainly affect everyone in complete unity, such as cyanide gas for
  instance. I don’t think there is a person on this or any other group that would
  find it to be a healthy alternative but today there is a facial cream made from
  a toxin and sold as a great emollient, I question its energies.
  I point now to the effects people can get from the homeopathic use of energies
  that are contained within tinctures that my be cut so many times that there are
  virtually no traces of the original material makeup, but the effect of
  stimulation to the body is maintained and at higher levels. These are not sold
  as quick fixes and I’m glad they aren’t because I don’t believe in the silver
  bullet either. However, the anecdotal information shows that many people have
  responded to the application of these energies.
  The main thing about energies contained in naturally occurring products, that
  is, those grown from the earths plants and animals, will have this natural
  energy within its structure. This is one of the reasons I believe people suffer
  from the use of such so called chemically made and unnatural foods such as
  aspartame. Those who report as having had reactions are reporting that their
  body is responding as a whole unit to the input of an unnatural food.
  We can take this even further to religious views regarding the consumption of
  certain natural foods. Some religions of the world consider some naturally grown
  foods as bad foods but for now I’ll just limit it to non-sectarian thought. But,
  we will still try to make it interesting.
  Perhaps we should take each of the tem points and see where there is agreement
  or disagreement. This I’m sure could take quite some writing time as well as
  thought.
  Dale
  <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<,
  At or about 16:24, 28/06/2002 (my clock), Dale Williams wrote the
  following:
  =========Start of Material Being Replied to========
  Just an interesting way of looking at things.

You must log in to post a comment.