About gall stones

1 response so far ↓

• 1 eddy600 // May 27, 2005 at 2:21 pm

  Hi John:
  I did answer your question. You didn’t read the answer. It is absolutly
  repetition of old stuff, but neither Clark or any of her supporters provide
  anything to the contrary. John, when are YOU going to provide evidence that
  f. buski lives outside the red area of that little map? When are YOU going
  to provide evidence that f. buski is found in ANY cancer in ANY area of the
  world, including the red map area? One liners don’t provide evidence, they
  simply display the unyielding lack of evidence of the writer.
  John, where did you get the notion that the AMA says that all heart disease
  is hereditary? I haven’t heard that. The medical profession in general is
  saying that high fat diets along with a sedentary life style is the cause of
  heart disease, and that hereditary factors play a role.
  John, your logic about birds only in Alaska is a pittiful excuse for trying
  to get f. buski out of SE Asia. It is another avoidance of the real issue,
  something that all Clark supporters are experts at. Neither I, nor anyone
  
  else have said that intestinal flukes are regionalized to SE Asia, only that
  the one that Clark dreams about in regard to cancer is.
  John, present a f. buski outside of the red map area, and/or one associated
  with cancer, and don’t dodge that one. Your little one-liners and warped
  logic can’t produce one.
  Jay
  Jay with another astounding disclosure! But, Jay, this is only repetition of
  old stuff.
  Like the AMA saying all heart disease is hereditary.
  Did you think it would surprise me they’d say flukes only exist in China?
  Next you’d be telling us birds only live in Alaska, or polar bears in
  Afganistan.
  And I noticed you didn’t answer my question.

You must log in to post a comment.